The Burlingame Endgame Murders Dilemma
The classic mystery, "Who killed Cock Robin? " has sparked the creation of many attractively creative stories of literary fiction in the past two centuries, that the writers of the future have endeavored to give the human mind puzzling murder-related scenarios that they can contemplate with the hope of finding solutions. There are many Americans are able to spend hours of their time going through Agatha Christie, James Patterson Dashiell, Patterson, and the other authors of murder mystery novels, some shocking real-life murders of a magnitude of more than 3000-plus, occurred on September 11, 2001 on one day, which required at that time the same, or even greater in the amount of deductive thinking and sound forensic investigation to unravel. Sixty-four of those murders might be filed as case-filed under the name, "The perplexing Burlingame Endgame Murders" named in honor of the pilot in command of American Airlines Flight 77, and the fifty-eight passengers, along with the remaining five of the crew who were onboard the Boeing 757. There was also the thrilling final portion of a chess match that always demands an extra-special concentration on detail that, according to officials of the US government, were allegedly transported through the west wall of the Pentagon at around 9:37 a.m. on 9/11 in the hands of an Arab hijacker named Hani Hanjour. Visit:- My thoughts were a bit stimulated when I was taking in the Larry O'Connor Show, on WMAL, 105.9 FM, on September 11, 2017. On that show, I was fascinated, but not entirely puzzled by the assertions of Debra Burlingame who is the youngest sister of late Flight 77 pilot, Charles Burlingame, about what supposedly occurred the 11th of September, 2001, in the Pentagon. Debra, supposedly a veteran lawyer, has, since 9/11, repeated the official version of what happened on Flight 77, a scheduled American Airlines Boeing 757 jet flight that was scheduled to fly from Washington, DC to Los Angles, California being hijacked during the flight and later flown by a high-jacker, Hanjour who was a high-jacker, into the Pentagon, saying that Charles Burlingame, along with the other 63 crew members and passengers , who were named on the American Airlines Flight 77 manifest was killed when the jet airliner made contact with the Pentagon's western wall, which was said to be at approximately 60 feet above the surface. It is completely baffling the claimed facts is why Debra has supported for the past 16 years an array of claims concerning the demise of her beloved brother which cannot have been caused by a scientifically impossible event. Since 9/11, many scientifically "correct" details about what "really" happened at the Pentagon during that horrible day have emerged from extensive investigation and forensic examinations of the dubious information that the federal government has claimed immediately following the Pentagon incident and, more recently, in its published 500-plus page tome "The Report of the 9/11 Commission." As an ex-deputy sheriff of the San Diego County Sheriff's Department, I graduated from the 72nd San Diego County Sheriff's Academy in June 1985 following extensive exposure to Forensics. Prior to that, I taken a course in organic chemistry for one period of time in an engineering course in Tyler Junior College (TJC) located situated in Tyler, Texas, and after earning a Baccalaureate degree at U.T. Tyler I finished my first, and only year of law school at Thomas Jefferson School of Law located in San Diego, California. In 1992, I received an M.A. Certificate from University of Texas at Tyler that included a graduate level course in forensic chemistry. So, I came to view the events, as well as the federally reported facts at the Pentagon from the perspective of an untrustworthy forensically trained police officer and I was able to see a totally distinct set of events, as I will set forth in this piece. In all likelihood, when large military or commercial jet aircraft hit mountains, the ground, as well as into buildings and skyscrapers , the crashes of these aircrafts leave behind a great deal of wreckage including engine component debris. The composite structure of a Boeing 757 is made up of ten tons of titanium and steel components for engines, which should be evident after an airplane crashed into the western wall of the Pentagon and the destructive impact of those engine parts should have caused the well-groomed grasses around the crash site to be badly damaged, gouged, and plainly messed-up. Yet, the facts show that the very first news crew to be at the Pentagon site right after the crash was CNN. CNN news crew broadcast a seventy second broadcast wherein the CNN reporter, Jamie McIntyre, stated that they "did not observe a crash of a Boeing 757 jet airliner on the west side of the Pentagon and the wall was damaged." He stated in plain language that "if there was an accident involving a large jet, it should be in the vicinity of the Pentagon as the wreckage found on the Pentagon grounds must have been the remains of some kind of much smaller aircraft." In the news clip, McIntyre looked plainly confused and that broadcast of seventy-seconds on CNN was not shown on national television following the day of 9/11, or even after. We are grateful for technology like the DVR because if the recording devices in the United States and in the homes of millions of television viewers were not in operation at that moment, that television broadcast segment was lost to the past, and it is likely that its existence would have been denied to CNN or the US government. Jamie McIntyre's subsequent denunciation, in 2002, of what he had reported seeing at the Pentagon was made in the early part of 2002, as concerned citizens who had heard and seen his news-flash, which was short-lived, began to question the federally claimed facts. The denial made by McIntyre about what he observed and heard on the morning of 9/11 was clearly forced through some form of intimidation as was the 1947 denial of U.S. Air Force Major Jesse Martel, the Air Force intelligence officer who had initially stated that he had clearly seen the remains of a crashed flying saucer near Roswell, New Mexico. The Major later confessed to having was instructed by a commander Air Force general to appear in a published Air Force picture and say that what he saw was the result of the collision of a balloon that was a weather balloon instead of what he had really seen. A movie was then made about Martel's denial, with Martin Sheen as a reporter who had found and interviewed Jesse Martel at an Army Air Corps reunion. Another intriguing factor that is entwined in the Flight 77 conundrum is the fact that the "only" evidence to support that hijacking on the Boeing 757 was the reported phone calls to theodore "Ted" Olson, the USDOJ's solicitor general and his wife the famous CNN reporter Barbara Olson, supposedly during the flight of AA 77. Olson has reported that his wife had called the solicitor general twice during Flight 77. The information is derived from Chapter 5 of Dr. David Ray Griffin's book in 2011, "9/11 Ten Years Later A Time when State Crimes Against Democracy Are Successful," "Chapter 5 turns on the main method by that the (conspiratorial) attackers convinced American people that the attacks had been orchestrated by Muslims as evidenced by the phone calls from the 9/11 planes. Through these calls, Americans were first informed about the fact that Middle Eastern men had hijacked four airliners. The information was supplied by a prominent official in the Bush-Cheney administration, the Department of Justice's solicitor general, Theodore "Ted" Olson. He stated to CNN and the world that his wife Barbara Olson, who was a prominent CNN reporter Barbara Olson, informed him that her plane, American Airlines 77, was hijacked by terrorists equipped with box-cutters and knives. In 2006 it became known to the public (by by way of FBI's evidence for the trial for Zacarias Moussaoui) that the report of Ted Olson that his wife phoned him twice on the AA 77 airline - was not accurate. This couldn't be more important, given the fact that the alleged phone calls had given basis for the conclusion that these planes had been hijacked, and being the first and most important conveyor of this reported evidence would be Ted Olson. However, Olson's American media, who have the responsibility of relaying this information to the American public, haven't been able to report the FBI's admission it was not aware that Olson calls never took place. This chapter also treats other evidence to show that "phone calls to planes" were never made."

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.